--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class:
9th Grade - Algebra I
School: Public high school (Grades
9-12), under-resourced district
Overarching
question:
How are
student mastery and student engagement affected when students are given more
autonomy over their learning?
Sub-questions:
1.
If students
are allowed to collaborate in the classroom, what will happen to their academic
achievement?
-Journal
-Exit tickets
-Pre-post test comparison
2.
How do
different instructional techniques affect student engagement and mastery?
-Journal
-Participation charts
-Interviews
3.
How does a
more student-lead classroom affect who I am as a teacher and how my students
perceive me?
-Journal
-Survey
-Interviews
I really like where you are going here, Dan. One question--and I've asked this of several of you now--how are you defining "achievement"? For me, the issue is student learning, rather than achievement.
ReplyDeleteSubQ3 is intriguing because it gets at your teaching identity. I like that you are questioning direct instruction as the sole pedagogical tool. The thing about collaborative learning is that it needs to be structured, and students need to practice it. before it can be of real use. It's a commitment, but an important one to try out.